Anaplan & Pigment Implementation · Finance, Revenue & HR Planning

AI-powered planning.
Built by people who've done it before.

We implement Anaplan and Pigment for Finance, Revenue, and HR teams — with deep hands-on experience in both platforms, real-world migrations between them, and AI features that are configured and working on day one. No junior bench. No vendor bias.

30 minutes with a senior practitioner — no sales pitch, just answers.
Annual Financial Plan · FY2026 · Pigment — Riverview LLP
AI Modeler active
FY2026 ARR Forecast
$142M
↑ 28% YoY · on plan
Operating Margin
18.4%
↑ 3.2pts vs prior year
Monthly Recurring Revenue — Actuals vs Plan
Actual
Plan
Scenario Planning
Base Case $142M ARR
Upside — 20% headcount expansion $158M ARR
Downside — hiring freeze H2 $128M ARR
Headcount Plan
248 / 250 target
99% to plan · 8 open reqs
AI Modeler Insight
Based on current pipeline velocity and historical close rates, Q4 ARR is tracking 6% above plan. Recommend revising upside scenario to $162M and stress-testing headcount model against accelerated hiring.
Apply to model →
Migrated from Anaplan Full planning suite · 3 months · zero data loss
✓ Live
ARR — Beginning of Year
$111M
FY2025 closing balance
Net New ARR (FY2026)
$31M
↑ New logo + expansion
ARR Waterfall — FY2026
BOY
New
Exp
Churn
EOY
NRR
118%
↑ Best-in-class
Pipeline Coverage
3.2×
↑ vs 2.8× target
Win Rate by Segment
Enterprise 42%
Mid-Market 61%
SMB 78%
AI Modeler Insight
Enterprise pipeline coverage is 2.1× vs 3.0× target. Adding 2 reps in Q2 and reclassifying 3 mid-market opps would close the coverage gap by Q3.
Model this scenario →
FY2026 Scenario Comparison
DOWNSIDE
$128M
Hiring freeze H2
↓ 10% vs plan
BASE CASE ✓
$142M
On plan
↑ 28% YoY
UPSIDE
$158M
20% HC expansion
↑ 11% vs plan
Key Assumptions by Scenario
Down
Base
Up
New Logos
38
52
64
Avg ACV
$280K
$310K
$335K
NRR
108%
118%
124%
Headcount
210
248
297
Operating Margin by Scenario
12.1%
18.4%
24.2%
AI Modeler Insight
Upside scenario requires 49 net-new hires by Q2. At current offer acceptance (74%), open 66 reqs now to hit target headcount in time to drive Q3 revenue.
Build hiring model →
Cash on Hand
$38.4M
↑ $2.1M vs last month
Runway
22 mo
At current burn rate
13-Week Cash Flow Forecast
Wk 1 Wk 7 Wk 13
Monthly Burn Breakdown
Payroll $3.2M
Vendors $0.7M
Facilities $0.5M
AI Modeler Insight
Week 5–6 shows a $1.4M payroll spike from commission payouts. Pre-positioning $2M in short-term instruments by Week 4 keeps min cash above $35M covenant threshold.
Model treasury position →
Total Headcount
248 / 250
99% to plan
Open Reqs
18
Avg 34 days open
By Department
Engineering 94 / 100
Jan Jun Dec
Hiring Health
Offer Acceptance 74%
Pipeline Fill Rate 61%
90-Day Retention 96%
AI Modeler Insight
Engineering is 6 headcount below target. 3 senior IC roles open >60 days — recommend expanding to contract-to-hire to unblock Q3 delivery milestones.
Update hiring plan →
Total Comp Spend
$18.4M
Annualised · on budget
Q2 Commission Payout
$3.2M
↑ 12% vs Q1
Quota Attainment Distribution
Below 80% 4 reps · $186K
80–100% 13 reps · $1.24M
100–120% 12 reps · $1.44M
>120% 5 reps · $340K
OTE vs Actual — Sales
AE
Sr. AE
SDR
CSM
OTE
Actual
AI Modeler Insight
13 reps at 80–100% attainment — the largest cohort. Average is 93%. Pipeline coverage for these reps is 2.6× — strong signal for Q3 if conversion holds.
Remodel commission plan →
Closed Won
$62M
↑ 8% vs prior yr
Commit
$24M
82% hist. close
Best Case
$14M
44% hist. close
Forecast by Stage — Q3
Closed Won $62M
Commit $24M
Best Case $14M
Pipeline $18M
Monthly Win Rate — Rolling 12
Apr '25 Mar '26
Coverage Ratio
Select a stage
Hist. Close Rate
Select a stage
AI Modeler Insight
$62M closed YTD — 44% of plan, running 8% ahead of prior year pace. Renewal cohort performing above plan with 97% gross retention. Click a stage to drill in.
Reforecast Q3 →
Overall Attainment
87%
↑ 4pts vs Q2
Reps at Quota
18 / 24
75% of team
By Region
East Region 94%
8 reps · $39.5M / $42M quota
Attainment by Region
East
94%
West
82%
Central
78%
Intl
91%
AI Modeler Insight
East region leads at 94% attainment. 7 of 8 reps at or above quota. Pipeline coverage is 3.1× — best region for Q4 upside. One open senior AE role in NYC could add $4–6M capacity.
Model territory expansion →
Trusted by industry leaders
What We Build

Planning infrastructure your team actually lives in.

Six use cases. Two platforms. One firm that has done all of it — in Anaplan, in Pigment, and across migrations between them.

FP&A Forecasting

Driver-based models that connect assumptions to outcomes — actuals integration, rolling forecasts, and scenario planning your finance team can run without IT involvement.

✦ Finance · Anaplan · Pigment
Learn more →

Revenue Planning

ARR models built on your actual contract structure — new logo, expansion, churn, and renewal modeled from the bottom up, connected to your CRM so forecast and pipeline stay in sync.

✦ RevOps · SaaS · ARR
Learn more →

3-Statement Forecasting

Integrated P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow — all connected and live. Built so your CFO can stress-test assumptions without rebuilding the model from scratch every quarter.

✦ CFO · Finance · Scenario planning
Learn more →

Workforce & Headcount Planning

Headcount models connecting hiring plans to P&L impact — by department, level, location, and timing. Synced with your HRIS so actuals flow in automatically.

✦ HR · Finance · Headcount
Learn more →

Territory & Quota Planning

Territory design, quota allocation, and coverage modeling — built to update as the org changes, not rebuilt annually. Supports multi-tier hierarchies and complex carve structures.

✦ RevOps · Sales · Quota
Learn more →

Commissions & Incentive Comp

End-to-end commission calculation engines — multi-tier logic, accelerators, overrides, dispute management, and rep-facing attainment visibility. Built so sales teams trust the numbers.

✦ Sales · Finance · Comp
Learn more →
View all services — including managed services and platform migration →
The Platforms

We implement both.
We recommend the right one for you.

We've run deep implementations in both Anaplan and Pigment — and migrated clients between them. Below is an honest summary of who each platform actually fits. The full breakdown is on our comparison page.

Anaplan

Stay with or choose Anaplan if…

Anaplan is the right platform for specific organizational profiles. We'll recommend it when these apply:

Global enterprise with 100+ legal entities and multi-currency consolidation
Dedicated planning CoE already fluent in Anaplan
5+ years of maintained models with significant custom logic
Stable business model that doesn't require frequent structural changes
Pigment

Choose or migrate to Pigment if…

For most enterprise SaaS companies evaluating connected planning today, the calculus has shifted considerably toward Pigment:

You want AI in your planning workflow now — not on a roadmap
Your business changes frequently — new GTM motion, restructures, new products
You've hit the IT bottleneck of waiting on Anaplan integration work
You're building a planning function without a large dedicated team to support it

Already on one platform and thinking about switching?

We've migrated complete planning ecosystems — financial, inventory, workforce, and compensation — from Anaplan to Pigment. We know exactly what it takes, what it costs, and where the risks are.

Why PlanFlamingo

The partner that stands out from the flock.

Most implementation firms pick a platform and push everyone toward it. We don't. Here's what makes us different.

2

Platforms. One firm.

Deep hands-on experience in both Anaplan and Pigment — and real migrations between them. We recommend based on what fits your situation, not what's profitable for us to recommend.

0

Junior staff on your project.

At the big firms, a senior practitioner sells the engagement, then hands it off to junior consultants learning on your dime. At PlanFlamingo, senior practitioners lead every engagement from scoping call to go-live.

AI

Activated from day one.

Both Anaplan and Pigment have powerful AI features most firms don't configure. We implement so your AI forecasting, scenario modeling, and Modeler Agent capabilities work on day one.

6

Use cases. Deep, not wide.

FP&A, revenue, 3-statement, workforce, territory, commissions — we've built all six in both platforms. We don't spread thin across dozens of use cases. We go deep on the ones that matter most to your CFO.

What Clients Say

From the teams who use it every day.

PlanFlamingo has been a fantastic partner in developing our integrations, models, and pages. Due to these efforts, the tool received the highest feedback score on our annual compensation survey and has made our commissions process exponentially more efficient, enabling us to implement our strategic vision.

JM
Joe Mark · Director of Revenue Operations
Renaissance

We'd been burned by a big consultancy before — expensive, slow, and we barely saw the senior people after the kickoff. PlanFlamingo was the opposite. They were in every working session.

ML
VP of Finance
MeridianLink

The migration from Anaplan to Pigment could have been a disaster. They knew both platforms deeply, planned for every edge case, and we went live on schedule with everything intact.

RL
Finance Lead
Riverview LLP
Jonathan Edwards, Founder of PlanFlamingo
Who We Are

Built by a practitioner.
For clients who deserve better.

PlanFlamingo was founded after years of Anaplan implementations inside one of the country's largest consulting firms — where the pattern was always the same: senior practitioners sold the engagement, junior consultants delivered it. We knew clients deserved better.

Every PlanFlamingo engagement is led by a senior practitioner with direct, hands-on experience in the platform we're building in. The person who joins your scoping call is the one building your model. No handoffs. No learning on your dime.

10+
Years of combined Anaplan & Pigment experience
550+
Sellers planned for across enterprise sales organizations
100%
Senior-led delivery — every engagement, no exceptions

Ready to make your planning actually work?

Whether you're evaluating Anaplan or Pigment, stuck on a failed implementation, or thinking about migrating platforms — let's talk. No pitch, no pressure.

30 minutes with a senior practitioner — no sales pitch, just answers.